1-888-632-5353

M-F 8 AM - 9 PM EST  
livechat my cart
Get 3 Extra Months FREE!

We are offering our new members 3 extra months of plan membership for free - a $20 to $50 value! Join a discount dental plan today and enjoy 15 months of dental care savings at no additional cost.



Concerns Over Kids' Shut-Eye an Age-Old Problem
Review finds that even 100 years ago, adults said that 'new' technology kept youngsters awake
By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter
Updated: 2/13/2012 11:00:01 AM
 

MONDAY, Feb. 13 (HealthDay News) -- With televisions, computers, cellphones, school work and extracurricular activities, parents worry that their kids are so busy that they aren't getting enough sleep.

But a new review suggests this is not a new problem, and perhaps it might not be a problem at all.

"Kids are sleeping less than they used to, with sleep declining by about 1.25 hours over the last 100 years," said review co-author Tim Olds, a professor of health sciences at the Sansom Institute for Health Research in Adelaide, Australia.

But, he said, it's not clear whether children are really missing that additional slumber.

"Health 'experts' have always recommended that kids get more sleep than they do, regardless of how much they get," he explained.

What's more, even 100 years ago, parents thought their children were shortchanging their shuteye time. In their review, Olds and his colleagues cited a study from 1905 that said: "The stress and strain of modern life necessitates increased brain activity, and in order that the mental energies may last, it is obvious that brain rest should be obtained."

By 1923, things still hadn't gotten much better. The researchers found this tidbit from research literature at that time: "the complexity and rush of modern life is not only affecting the adult [sleeping patterns] but is reflected in the children."

Interestingly, no matter what the sleep concern -- school books, radio, television, Internet -- experts felt that the only way to counter the 'overstimulation' of the brain brought on by the latest technology was sleep.

After reviewing 100 years of research, Olds and his colleagues found 32 different sets of sleep recommendations.

Yet, the investigators weren't able to find any convincing evidence to back up those sleep recommendations for children today or in the past. And between 1897 and 2009, the recommendations on nightly sleep dropped by about 0.71 minutes per year.

Coincidentally, the amount of sleep children actually got dropped during that same period by 0.73 minutes a night per year.

Overall, youngsters consistently got less sleep than what sleep experts recommended. On average, kids slept about 37 minutes less than whatever the 'optimal' recommendation of the day was, the study authors noted.

Olds said there probably isn't a set number of hours of sleep that's ideal for any individual child.

"There is a great deal of variability in optimal sleep amongst kids. One child may function best on seven hours, another on 11 hours," he said.

In the review, the researchers noted that just because a child sleeps late doesn't necessarily mean that he or she really needs more sleep. Just as people may eat when they are not hungry, children may sleep more even if they don't really need it, the authors explained.

Just last week, Brigham Young University (BYU) researchers reported that most teens aged 16 to 18 don't get the nine hours of sleep a night that federal guidelines recommend, and yet they perform better in school when they only get seven hours of shuteye each night.

One reason? The current federal guidelines are based on studies where teens were simply told to keep sleeping until they felt satisfied, the BYU researchers noted.

"If you used that same approach for a guideline on how much people should eat, you would put them in a well-stocked pantry and just watch how much they ate until they felt satisfied," lead researcher Mark Showalter said in a university statement. "Somehow that doesn't seem right."

Olds, the review co-author, did recommend that parents "try to even out sleep between school days and non-school days to avoid yo-yo sleeping." He also said parents should be alert to signs of sleepiness.

According to Dr. Edith Chernoff, a chronic disease physician at La Rabida Children's Hospital in Chicago, daytime sleepiness is a key sign that your child isn't getting enough sleep.

"Gauge your own kids, and see how well they're doing during the day," she recommended. If they're sleepy during the day or early evening, they're probably not getting enough sleep.

Chernoff said that parents don't need to worry if they have trouble waking their kids in the morning; it's not necessarily a sign of too little sleep. In young children, she said, if they are having a lot of tantrums and fight going to bed, but then fall asleep quickly, they're probably not getting enough sleep.

The bottom line, Chernoff said, is to do what works for your family.

"This study pointed out that we are all concerned about children's sleep, and that hasn't changed over 100-plus years, even though we really don't understand how much sleep is enough," said Chernoff.

Parents today may feel that they rightly have more to be concerned about with all the gadgets filling their children's spare time. But, Olds said today's distractions probably aren't any worse than those of yesteryear.

"The sleep guidelines study shows us that parents and educators are concerned about whatever the new technology of the time is: radio, television, Internet. I don't think there's anything especially noxious about today's technology apart from its ubiquity, which makes it hard for parents to police. In 20 years' time new technologies will be the focus of concern, perhaps wearable computers, or brainwave interpreters," Olds added.

Results of the sleep review were released online Feb. 13, and are scheduled to be published in the March print issue of Pediatrics.

More information

Read more about sleep and children from the Nemours Foundation.

SOURCES: Timothy Olds, Ph.D., professor, health sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, Adelaide, Australia; Edith Chernoff, M.D., chronic disease physician and medical director, Premier Kids program, La Rabida Children's Hospital, Chicago; March 2012, Pediatrics

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Customer Care - 1-888-632-5353 Toll Free

  
Additional Articles
Bullying a Strong Risk Factor for Suic...
Don't Forget Your Kids on Valentine's ...
Health Tip: Treating Jaw Pain
Health Tip: Is Your Child Anxious?
Stem Cell Treatment Might Reverse Hear...
Wider Waistlines Linked to Memory Prob...
No Cancer Benefit From Vitamin B, Omeg...
Smog May Harm Women's Brains: Study
Mediterranean Diet Might Be Healthier ...
Zioptan Eyedrops Approved for Glaucoma...
Handling Divorce May Be Easier Later i...
Home Oxygen Could Raise Burn Risk: Exp...
Mom's Vitamin D Levels Linked to Langu...
Exercise a Defense Against Dementia: S...
Health Highlights: Feb. 13, 2012
Higher Cancer Rate Seen in Children Wi...
Concerns Over Kids' Shut-Eye an Age-Ol...
Radiation After Lung Cancer Surgery Do...
More Young Adults Get Health Care When...
Screening by Primary-Care Doctors May ...
Health Tip: Chewing Tobacco Harms Oral...
Health Tip: If You're Diabetic and Pre...
Overeating May Double Risk of Memory L...
Best Friend Benefits Child's Mind, Bod...
John, Mary, Joe: Simpler Names May Hel...
Kindergartners Who Can Pay Attention M...
Young Adults Who Quit Smoking Feel Bet...
Prostate Size May Be Clue to Severity ...
Gloves, Padded Headgear Helps Protect ...
Many Gay Men Would Support 'Home HIV T...
Obesity Appears Linked to Pain
Brain Scans May Predict How People Lea...
Most Teens Who Self-Harm Are Not Evalu...
Smoking May Up Cancer Risk in Barrett'...
White House Alters Controversial Birth...
Study Weighs Pros, Cons of Home or Hos...
When Mom Has Pregnancy Diabetes, Breas...
Repeat C-Section Best Scheduled at 39 ...
HIV Severity, Treatment Unrelated to K...
Health Highlights: Feb. 10, 2012

Add to Google MSN HealthDay  Add HealthDay To My Yahoo  Subscribe with Bloglines   Subscribe in NewsGator Online HealthDay News Feed

The materials and articles published on DentalPlans.com are for informational purposes only. Although DentalPlans.com strives to be accurate and complete, the information is provided without liability for errors. DentalPlans.com does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text graphics, links, or other items contained on DentalPlans.com.

DentalPlans.com expressly disclaims liability for errors or omissions in these materials and DentalPlans.com makes no commitment to update the information on DentalPlans.com.

DentalPlans.com expressly disclaims all liability for the use or interpretation by others of information on DentalPlans.com. Decisions based on information contained on DentalPlans.com are the sole responsibility of the visitors, and visitors agree to hold DentalPlans.com and its Affiliates harmless against any claims for damages arising from decisions visitors make on such information.

Nothing on DentalPlans.com constitutes medical advice or other forms of advice. DentalPlans.com assumes no responsibility for material created or published by third parties linked to DentalPlans.com with or without DentalPlans.com’s knowledge.