Individual and Family Discount Dental Plans, Affordable
Dental Care Starting at $79.95 a Year!
1-888-632-5353 
M-F 8 AM - 9 PM EST 

Find Plans in Your Area
 
ZIP code
 

Find Dentists in Your Area
 
ZIP code
 
Dentist last name
(optional)
 




you are here: DentalPlans.com > Dental Health Articles > HealthDay > Shorter More Intense Radiation OK for Some Breast Cancers

Shorter, More Intense Radiation OK for Some Breast Cancers
Three-week course comparable to six-week treatment, researchers find
By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter
Updated: 11/4/2009 3:00:10 PM
 

WEDNESDAY, Nov. 4 (HealthDay News) -- A shorter, more intense course of whole-breast radiation works as well as the traditional six-week course, at least for some early-stage breast cancers, a new study shows.

"This concept of a shorter length of treatment is gaining acceptance," said Dr. Manjeet Chadha, associate chair of radiation oncology at Beth Israel Medical Center and associate professor of radiation oncology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, both in New York City. Chadha led the study and is scheduled to present the results Wednesday at the American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meeting, in Chicago.

Researchers previously have tried to investigate whether they can alter the duration of radiation therapy or the volume, Chadha said. "My study focuses on the duration of it," she said.

In her three-week treatment -- called accelerated hypofractionated whole breast irradiation -- a woman gets the entire affected breast irradiated and receives a ''boost,'' or extra dose, at the site where the tumor was removed. Other approaches include giving a boost dose after the entire radiation treatment to the whole breast is completed.

Chadha's study is ongoing, but she planned to report on 122 patients with early-stage breast cancers who underwent lumpectomies followed by the accelerated treatment. They were then tracked for a median of two and a half years (half followed longer, half less). The patients' median age was 66.

No relapses were noted, and the three-year survival rate was nearly 95 percent, Chadha said.

''It sounds encouraging," she said of her results. To further evaluate the accelerated treatment, she compared the first 50 patients on the briefer approach to a matched group of 70 patients who got the more traditional six-week radiation treatment.

Side effects, such as skin irritation and redness, were similar, she found. ''There was no difference in fatigue or breast edema [swelling]," she said. The cosmetic results were satisfactory, too.

The new study adds some valuable information for doctors trying to decide for individual women which radiation treatment approach might be best, said Dr. Nayana Vora, a professor of radiation oncology and associate member of the developmental cancer therapeutics program at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, Calif.

''It's a short follow-up,'' she said, noting that some side effects may surface later. But, she noted that a study outside the United States that looked at the briefer treatments has followed patients for up to 12 years with results similar to Chadha's study.

''Very few studies have been documented in the U.S. with external whole beam [to the whole breast] and a concomitant boost," Vora said. ''It tell us that, yes, patients can be treated with a short course of radiation treatment. Will it become the standard of care? I don't know."

While Vora typically offers her patients the six-week treatment unless they can't commit to that time period because of transportation problem or other obstacles, she said she now may consider the shorter treatment.

In another study to be presented at the oncology meeting, researchers reported that breast cancer patients who have a mastectomy and then receive radiation to the lymph nodes behind the breast bone (the internal mammary lymph nodes) do not live longer than those who don't get those nodes treated.

The study evaluated 1,334 women with stage 1 or 2 breast cancers that had spread to the axillary lymph nodes under the arms or whose original tumor was in a central, internal location. All got radiation to the chest wall and nodes above the collar bone. But half got the internal mammary radiation and half did not.

After a decade, survival differences between the groups were small, with 60 percent of those who didn't get the extra radiation still alive, and 63 percent of those who got it surviving.

Most radiation oncologists are reluctant to radiate the internal mammary nodes, Vora explained, because of their proximity to the heart.

More information

To learn more about radiation therapy, visit the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

SOURCES: Manjeet Chadha, M.D., associate chair, radiation oncology, Beth Israel Hospital, and associate professor, radiation oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, both in New York City; Nayana L. Vora, M.D., professor, radiation oncology, and associate member, developmental cancer therapeutics program, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, Calif.

Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

Customer Care - 1-888-632-5353 Toll Free

  
Additional Articles
Overeating May Double Risk of Memory...
Best Friend Benefits Child's Mind,...
John, Mary, Joe: Simpler Names May Help...
Kindergartners Who Can Pay Attention...
Young Adults Who Quit Smoking Feel...
Prostate Size May Be Clue to Severity ...
Gloves, Padded Headgear Helps Protect...
Many Gay Men Would Support 'Home HIV...
Obesity Appears Linked to Pain
Brain Scans May Predict How People...
Most Teens Who Self-Harm Are Not for in...
Smoking May Up Cancer Risk in Barrett's...
White House Alters Controversial Birth...
Study Weighs Pros, Cons of Home or...
When Mom Has Pregnancy Diabetes, Curbs...
Repeat C-Section Best Scheduled at 39...
HIV Severity, Treatment Unrelated to...
Health Highlights: Feb. 10, 2012
More Than 4 Million Americans Have New...
H1N1 'Swine' Flu Makes a Comeback in...
Health Tip: A Sprain in the Neck
Health Tip: Are You at Risk for Hip...
Pot Use Could Double Risk of Car Crash,...
Recent Pot Use Could Double Risk of Car...
Chemo During Pregnancy Doesn't Seem to...
C-Sections Might Put Preemies at Risk...
Fear of Lawsuits Influences Care From...
More Patients Seek Plastic Surgery From...
Stopping Bone Drug Cuts Risk of Second...
Heart Disease May Be Risk Factor for...
In Mice, Cancer Drug Shows Effect on...
Strutting the Catwalk in Red, Stars...
Illicit Drugs Bought Off Internet May...
More U.S. Doctors Are Urging Patients...
4 New Genes Linked to Type 2 Diabetes
Health Highlights: Feb. 9, 2012
Risk of Preterm Birth Rises for Women...
Bug Bites May Have Caused Zebras'...
More People Need Training in Lifesaving...
Health Tip: Healthier Ways to Prepare...

Add to Google MSN HealthDay
 Add HealthDay
 To My Yahoo  Subscribe with Bloglines   Subscribe in NewsGator Online HealthDay
 News Feed

The materials and articles published on DentalPlans.com are for informational purposes only. Although DentalPlans.com strives to be accurate and complete, the information is provided without liability for errors. DentalPlans.com does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text graphics, links, or other items contained on DentalPlans.com.

DentalPlans.com expressly disclaims liability for errors or omissions in these materials and DentalPlans.com makes no commitment to update the information on DentalPlans.com.

DentalPlans.com expressly disclaims all liability for the use or interpretation by others of information on DentalPlans.com. Decisions based on information contained on DentalPlans.com are the sole responsibility of the visitors, and visitors agree to hold DentalPlans.com and its Affiliates harmless against any claims for damages arising from decisions visitors make on such information.

Nothing on DentalPlans.com constitutes medical advice or other forms of advice. DentalPlans.com assumes no responsibility for material created or published by third parties linked to DentalPlans.com with or without DentalPlans.coms knowledge.

Let's Get Connected
Like Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter DentalPlans.com Blog, Dental Insurance Alternatives View Our YouTube Channel
Email Me Savings & Updates
Submit
Privacy Policy
The DENTALPLANS.COM website is administered by DENTALPLANS.COM, INC., a licensed Florida Discount Medical Plan Organization, 8100 S.W. 10th Street Suite #2000, Plantation, FL 33324. Plans and Programs offered by DentalPlans.com are not health insurance policies. Plans and Programs offered by DentalPlans.com provide discounts at certain health care providers for medical services. Plans and Programs offered by DentalPlans.com do not make payments directly to the providers of medical services. The Plan or Program member is obligated to pay for all health care services but will receive a discount from those health care providers who have contracted with the Plan, Program or discount plan organization.
Special promotions including but not limited to additional months free and Membership Rewards® points from American Express are not available to California residents.

© 1999-2011 DentalPlans.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Patents Pending. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida is an Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.
BBB Rating A+    McAfee SECURE sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams